A Discussion on the Three-Tier Logic of Arbitrators' Civil Liability

Authors

  • Nini Wang School of Law, Anhui University of Finance & Economics, Bengbu Anhui 233030, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/arpb6496

Keywords:

Arbitrator's civil liability, Status attributes, Limited immunity.

Abstract

The system of arbitrator liability is a core issue in the arbitration legal system, involving a balance between the fairness and efficiency of arbitration and the protection of the parties' rights. This paper, starting from the theoretical foundation of the legal status of arbitrators, systematically analyzes the composition, exemption boundaries, and improvement paths of the arbitrator liability system. First, based on contractual relationships, it explores the special service contract relationship between arbitrators and parties; second, from the perspective of their status, it analyzes the quasi-judicial functions and professional duty of care of arbitrators; finally, combining the theory of judicial immunity, it proposes to construct a limited exemption system "based on the degree of fault in defining the scope of liability." By comparing international legislative examples with the limitations of Article 38 of China's Arbitration Law, it proposes suggestions for improving China's arbitrator liability system, including clarifying the nature of liability, optimizing procedural safeguards, and establishing professional insurance mechanisms, to achieve a value balance between the fairness and efficiency of arbitration.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Cao Wei. A Study on the Relationship between Arbitration Institutions and Arbitrators [D]. Southwest University for Nationalities, 2012.

[2] Zhou Xinlin. Professional ethics of arbitrators in major civil law countries [J]. Legal System and Society, 2015.

[3] Fan Mingchao. A Study on the Legal System of Arbitrator Liability [D]. East China University of Political Science and Law, 2012.

[4] Bao Wenjie. An Exploration of the Arbitrator Responsibility System [D]. East China University of Political Science and Law, 2008.

[5] Shi Xianming. On the nature of commercial arbitration and the rights and obligations of arbitrators [J]. Political and Legal Review, 2010.

[6] Lin Mincong, He Qianbei. Research on improving the arbitrator responsibility system in China [J]. Legal System and Society , 2016.

Downloads

Published

25-05-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Wang, N. (2026). A Discussion on the Three-Tier Logic of Arbitrators’ Civil Liability. Academic Journal of Law and Society, 1(2), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.54097/arpb6496